Okay, Charles, out of every 100 acts of violence in the Baltimore Metropolitan Area the acts are initiated at approximately the following rates, though every 100 acts come out slightly different than the next with those I have collected bunching together by happenstance into this pattern:
1 are committed by Latinos*
4 are committed by whites
10 are committed by cop
85 are committed by blacks
Rough guide to source by type, which contradicts the aggression patterns, favoring defenders and witnesses over aggressors:
Latino = 1%
White = 75%
Cops = 2%
Black = 22%
Note that the black population is about 50% in the “Baltimore Area” though higher in the city, with higher percentages of blacks in certain areas always correlating with higher rates of violence.
*The current Latino population is small and unusually docile. This will change.
Of the people I personally know in Baltimore:
Most of the Latinos have been the targets of violence, primarily by blacks
All of the working class whites have been the targets of violence, primarily by blacks, secondarily by cops
Few of the upscale whites have had any experience with violence of any kind, the only ones being those who take part in gentrification initiatives near black ghettos, with people that live in all white suburbs rarely ever experiencing aggression of any type
All of the cops have been targets of violence, primarily by blacks
All of the blacks have had numerous experiences as the targets of violence, primarily by blacks, secondarily by cops
The fact is the Black Baltimore is a predatory matrix and that predators tend to (1) hunt in their home range and (2) select the easiest prey.
So long as blacks are isolated in black ghettos they will almost exclusively prey on one another. When in a mixed environment they will switch to easier white prey. When a white enters the all-black environment, unless he is obviously a predator, he will immediately be slotted as a soft, tasty and eater-friendly morsel.
The important thing to remember is that black predation takes on three forms outside of the dominant gang warfare.
1. Opportunistic predation as soft targets become available is something that roughly one third of the black urban population will engage in impulsively. Drop Donald Trump into a ghetto naked but for his hair and money belt and three out of ten blacks will attack him on sight.
2. Mob attacks are something that five out of ten blacks will engage in if they have been properly incited to lash out at the invisible forces that “keep them down.” Wandering into a black area at the wrong time could result in you being mistaken or served up as a scapegoat for these oppressive white forces of evil.
3. About two in ten black males have a highly developed sense of interracial predation and will typically go on lone stalks, paired hunts, or raids with three or more men in the party into predominantly non-black communities. When living, travelling and working outside of a majority black area these are the only types of black attackers you typically need to be concerned with. Note that in black enclaves these types of hunters prey almost exclusively on other blacks. Sometimes the stalker, hunter or raider that is operating in a non-black area is simply practicing his craft on easy targets, and will eventually return to the ghetto to rob drug dealers. Sometimes he is a specialist and sometimes he has advanced to a more profitable low-risk target base that requires more subtle handling, as police will have an effective presence in most non-black areas.
By avoiding black areas you avoid most mob assaults and a lot of opportunistic aggression.
By avoiding mixed areas you avoid most opportunistic aggression that takes place outside of black enclaves.
Charles, the only reason why black people get attacked more often than white people is that they coexist with other black people at a much higher rate, in closer proximity and for longer periods. Black America has been so perversely sculpted to engage in violence by the sick people that run this nation that the study of violence and aggression in urban and suburban America cannot be undertaken without first acknowledging that race [not interracial relations, but the mere presence or absence of able-bodied blacks] is the primary indicator that acts of violence are likely or imminent.
When you speak to any black Baltimorean, and have them rate the worst areas to live in, they will rate areas with 100% black occupation as the worst neighborhoods and predominantly white areas as the most desirable.