Click to Subscribe
‘Not to Be Led Astray’
Mike and James On Marcus Aurelius
© 2020 James LaFond
JUN/25/20
James,
I have read Marcus Aurelius' Meditations and have been struggling with this quote :
''...not to be led astray into enthusiasm for rhetoric, for writing on speculative themes, for discoursing on moralizing texts.... To avoid oratory, poetry, and 'fine writing.''
What could be the reason for the Emperor's distrust of literature - specifically poetry and what he calls 'fine writing'? His disdain for rhetoric is understandable; it distracts from action and leads one down verbose (and often convoluted) thought experiments that seldom produce anything of actual value. But what of poetry, novels and other works of fiction? I myself find great value in them as they feed my imagination and offer different perspectives on various subject.
What is your take on this quote, and should one really be weary of literary works of fiction?
Best regards,
- Mike

Mike, I am not an expert on Aurelius, only read his meditations twice and for one of these reads was poorly focused. He was, furthermore, not perfect, but rather seems to have sought this through his stoicism. He was the last of the Five Good Emperors, choosing his son instead of the most worthy successor, breaking with the examples of Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian and Antonius Pious.
Perhaps that was wisdom.
Perhaps he looked around and found no successor able to cope with the increasingly insurmountable problem of the barbarians without and the degenerates within.
Nerva the administrator had chosen Trajan the soldier, who chose Hadrian the builder, who chose Antonius the pious who chose Marcus the philosopher—our only Philosopher King in the antiquitous West so far as I know. Perhaps he knew the gig was up and might as well either give his son Commodus the best chance or sacrifice him on the altar of Time…
Marcus was very much a man of a time similar to ours.
His distaste for writing on speculative themes sounds like an attempt to keep the sharpest minds from retreating into fantasy. His age needed men of action and such men tend to disdain speculative musings. I might find such things fascinating, but I am not a man of political, social or military action.
Discoursing on moralizing texts is something I have long found distasteful in that it brings us forever a step or two away from reality and into the fields of utopia, just like the speculative pursuits bring us to dystopia. Marcus’ suspicion of the value of these pursuits rings true in this world we live in where reality is forever under assault by the rapacious pack of lies wielded by our masters. Currently, the people I know who are most miserable and indecisive in their lives, are those deeply philosophical and read in the sissy literature of the philosophers. Might Marcus have known the like minds of many in his age of gathering troubles?
Oratory and fine writing tend to be static pursuits.
As far as poetry, much of poetics consists of the inward musings of alienated souls, which can be quite useful meditational tools for the rulers of a society not in crisis. We can’t forget Marcus was the king of the world’s greatest nation to date.
The epic poems were nearly a thousand years old and Marcus lived in a time when aside from some experimentation in prose, such as the Acts of John and Thecla, that poetics consisted mostly of satire, comedy and rewriting of ancient Greek texts. His age lacked originality. In much the same way as the many music lovers I know, into all manner of music, complain that nothing really original has been recorded in the past 20 years and that moviegoers note that most movies are sequels, reboots or rewrites of earlier movies, I would take Marcus’ advice on avoiding poetics as an admonition not to descend into naval-gazing introversion or swim with the sewer-like stream of popular culture.
Thanks for checking the refresh setting on my brain, Mike.
‘Doom and Gloom’
crackpot mailbox
Tribes? Pizza Wars?
eBook
night city
eBook
thriving in bad places
eBook
advent america
eBook
solo boxing
eBook
broken dance
eBook
beasts of aryas
eBook
the greatest boxer
eBook
sons of aryas
eBook
all-power-fighting
eBook
by the wine dark sea
eBook
uncle satan
eBook
logic of force
eBook
on the overton railroad
eBook
sorcerer!
eBook
logic of steel
eBook
into leviathan’s maw
eBook
dark, distant futures
eBook
the year the world took the z-pill
eBook
the first boxers
eBook
the fighting edge
eBook
blue eyed daughter of zeus
eBook
under the god of things
eBook
fiction anthology one
eBook
your trojan whorse
eBook
within leviathan’s craw
eBook
wife—
eBook
barbarism versus civilization
eBook
the lesser angels of our nature
eBook
masculine axis
eBook
z-pill forever
eBook
taboo you
eBook
the gods of boxing
eBook
fanatic
eBook
let the world fend for itself
eBook
ranger?
eBook
on combat
eBook
orphan nation
eBook
predation
eBook
the greatest lie ever sold
eBook
book of nightmares
eBook
the sunset saga complete
eBook
cracker-boy
eBook
songs of aryas
eBook
time & cosmos
eBook
hate
eBook
winter of a fighting life
eBook
america the brutal
eBook
the combat space
eBook
fate
eBook
song of the secret gardener
eBook
triumph
eBook
when you're food
eBook
honor among men
eBook
son of a lesser god
eBook
menthol rampage
Utter Contempt     Jun 27, 2020

I think one way to view this quote from Aurelius is to contrast what he's describing with the terseness of Hemingway, or Flaubert's "mot juste." The Emperor's not anti-literature, he's anti-bullshit.
James     Jun 28, 2020

Yaas!
  Add a new comment below:
Name
Email
Message