Click to Subscribe
‘The Pain of Being Human’
War Before Civilization: The Myth of the Peaceful Savage by Lawrence H. Heeley
© 2014 James LaFond
JUL/18/14
1996, Oxford University Press, NY, 245 pages, with illustrations, photos, and extensive tables and bar graphs
If you would like to know what is the matter with the post-modern academic world than War Before Civilization is the best primer you could read on how and why—and to what effect—the delusional fantasies that constitute the intellectual world of our time came into being. Heeley’s first few chapters are about the struggles he faced to even be permitted to dig for the truth, through the objective study of physical evidence, that mankind might have actually been in the habit of occasionally harming other humans, before us evil white bastards invented war.
Oddly enough, the uninformed juvenile fantasies of Thomas Hobbes and Jean Jacques Rousseau [two men who knew about as much about the actualities of life outside of their small communities than today’s typical reality TV viewer] have, and still do, form the basis for most academic opinion on the conduct of pre-modern peoples. Two excellent examples are multi-million-viewer YouTube successes; Peter Joseph who promotes Rousseau’s ideal of the noble savage, or naturally good person, and Stefan Molyneux who comes off as a fairly firm student of Hobbes, seeing man as nothing but a creature of greed, who does nothing without a clearly defined view toward personal material gain.
Throughout War Before Civilization Heeley shows time and again that these two opposing philosophies will always take the thinker farther from the actuality of war than any eight-year-old child’s flight of fantasy could ever accomplish.
For decades I have read everything I could get my hands on concerning primitive life, warfare, and aggression. Despite wanting to prove my childhood fantasies—born of watching Hollywood adventure films as a child—that my gun-toting ancestors followed the only path to excellence in war, my reading has brought me to the conclusion that all civilizations have been brilliantly ineffective at fielding lethal fighting forces, until that point which they have adopted primitive [unconventional or guerilla] methods.
The evidence is fairly plain:
Until about 1900, and the wide spread use of machine guns and repeating riffles, a modern western military force was likely to fair poorly against equal numbers of stone age hunters.
The small unit tactics of western militaries that have culminated in the frightfully effective small scale special operations forces that now undertake most of the world’s combat operations can be traced directly to Eastern Woodland Indians teaching European settlers and British light infantry how to fight most effectively with the firearm.
Archaeological evidence points overwhelmingly to highly lethal war-making on the part of prehistoric peoples.
Ethnographic surveys by the very same anthropologists that credit primitives with being peaceful occupants of Eden and ineffective war-fighters, instead demonstrate that stone age societies have generally fielded more competent military forces with less resources than agrarian or industrial societies, and inflict greater losses per capita on their antagonists.
In short, it is no accident that post-modern nations like the U.S. have formed ‘special operations forces’ and even ‘commands.’ The U.S. military now fields ‘warriors’ rather than ‘soldiers.’ As far back as 1967 when the U.S. Army fielded long range recon patrols, and the Navy began converting under water demolitions personnel to SEAL’s in Vietnam, the officers fighting wars on the ground and coming home to teach at staff colleges realized that they would be much better off sending in a war party of Apache warriors than a squad of U.S. soldiers. Unfortunately the Apaches were out of business by then. So now the military makes its own Apaches, and names the occasional wicked instrument of death after some scary Native American or his weapon.
Only in a fairy tale world of blind privilege and dumb ignorance could the learned consensus be that a hunter who learned the art of mobile, stealthy killing from age five, ‘must’ make an inferior war fighter to a terrified urbanite who grew up whining to his mother for more cupcakes, and then at age 18 suddenly had an incredibly lethal instrument of death placed in his hands and showed vaguely how to use it by some hard-ass who was screaming at him.
Only in a make-believe world could an intelligent person be easily led to believe that a man who pushed markers around on a map and rode domesticated herbivores in preparation for war would have something to teach a man who scouted for enemies every time he urinated and hunted and ate wild herbivores and predators, about the realities of war, let alone all of it!
As with any book on the perennial favorite subject of authors, War Before Civilization offers the reader many Oh My God moments of jaw-dropping realization. Below are some of my favorites:
1. The rate of violent death in prehistoric [occupied by pre-Kevin Costner American Indians] Illinois was 70 times the U.S. homicide rate!
2. Battlefield medicine by primitive shamans was more effective than western medicine until WWI!
3. Stone age societies have all provided better care for psychological casualties than any modern or postmodern society.
4. One particular chief on the island of Fiji placed a stone behind his house for every person he had eaten. When he was finally interviewed by an ethnographer, the line of stones was 200 feet long, and numbered 782. I wonder what dinner table conversation was like in that house, “Yo Dad, this guy was a little stringy. Do you think we could raid a village next week—maybe bag some fat dude?”
I highly recommend War Before Civilization as a good, academia-busting, informative read.
‘Tool Theory’
book reviews
‘Impossible Things’
eBook
within leviathan’s craw
eBook
fiction anthology one
eBook
the year the world took the z-pill
eBook
the lesser angels of our nature
eBook
song of the secret gardener
eBook
time & cosmos
eBook
broken dance
eBook
z-pill forever
eBook
the gods of boxing
eBook
under the god of things
eBook
your trojan whorse
eBook
hate
eBook
the greatest boxer
eBook
predation
eBook
all-power-fighting
eBook
blue eyed daughter of zeus
eBook
on the overton railroad
eBook
triumph
eBook
logic of steel
eBook
thriving in bad places
eBook
ranger?
eBook
orphan nation
eBook
book of nightmares
eBook
by the wine dark sea
eBook
solo boxing
eBook
let the world fend for itself
eBook
honor among men
eBook
uncle satan
eBook
wife—
eBook
songs of aryas
eBook
logic of force
eBook
advent america
eBook
sorcerer!
eBook
the combat space
eBook
the fighting edge
eBook
winter of a fighting life
eBook
into leviathan’s maw
eBook
fanatic
eBook
dark, distant futures
eBook
america the brutal
eBook
menthol rampage
eBook
masculine axis
eBook
fate
eBook
beasts of aryas
eBook
barbarism versus civilization
eBook
on combat
eBook
son of a lesser god
eBook
taboo you
eBook
cracker-boy
eBook
the first boxers
eBook
the greatest lie ever sold
eBook
the sunset saga complete
eBook
when you're food
eBook
night city
eBook
sons of aryas
Hugh Maguire     Jan 19, 2016

James I am also a huge fan of books on primitive warfare, I thoroughly enjoyed Keeley's book.

I would love to hear any other quality suggestions you have on the topic?
James     Jan 19, 2016

It is hard to find something on primitive warfare for the reasons Keeley puts fourth.

Try Mails, Mystic Warriors of the Plains.

For primitive culture without a focus on[or a denial of] warfare, try Brian Fagan.

Also, see what Osprey books has available.

Muzzleloader magazine does at least one article per issue on Indian warfare.

Books on the Zulu wars like The Washing of the Spears and Like Lions they Fought come to mind. Most of the info on primitive warfare comes from modern versus primitive colonial warfare or American Indian.

Sorry I could not be of more help, Hugh.
Sam J.     Mar 31, 2016

I don't know if you've seen "The Gods Must be Crazy". A great very funny movie but a lie. They say the Bushmen in Africa were peaceful but I read a article from the past, wish I could remember where, that said to set up a camp in the bush you needed to clear a 100 yard path around the camp or Bushmen would sneak up and kill you with poison arrows. Eventually that was probably why they began to shoot them on sight. I think the same was going on in Australia with the Aborigines.

I haven't read "War Before Civilization". I really need to.
  Add a new comment below:
Name
Email
Message