Thanks to
for getting me kindled...
I'd like to put this Moon Landing shit to rest once and for all for those who can handle it. Admittedly I am feeding the fire I seek to extinguish, but I won't be hindered. This debate is, like most other debates, materialized by script writers who know their target audience well. It needs to die in fire. Instead of trading in lofty cues and having you crawl your way out of this timeless mental maze, I will continue my literary tradition of giving you a finite answer.
1. THE APOLLO 11 MOON LANDING WAS FAKE
... but also, and just as importantly ...
2. That's it for fake. We've been to the Moon so many times before and since, we should be Rewards Club members.
Simply weighing-in on this stupid debate keeps it alive, and therein lies its principal purpose: It keeps people centered on what might possibly be, the most inconsequential thing to argue over, ever. By weighing-in, you weigh-in on nothing. By continuing the debate, you identify yourself as a tangoist of stupid dances, and a lender of ugly sweaters to your peers. The public can never move on. If somehow you settle on an answer with true conviction, you've already played yourself, DJ Khaled be damned.
What difference does it make if the 60s landing was real? Does it uproot the subsequent technologies that have come to rule our life? Would a definitive answer change a modern perspective in any way whatsoever?
Answer: Yes -> Whew!—that was close! Uncle Sam's reputation saved from this 1 near miss.
Answer: NO -> I knew it! There's secrets going on in Washington! Sound the alarm.
If this debate is ever truly settled, you arrive at the doorstep of non-action. What crime and who dunnit? Lying-ass NASA from a century ago misinformed my elders! How Awful! And that certainly makes sense, because we were doing bad things back then like Vietnam and not giving folks their civil rights. Crime and Culprit settled! Nothing to do now but grab Lunch.
The debate cannot be settled by design; there isn't a path forward. Each and every time someone brings up the Moon Landing, it re-orients our minds back to page one, an insufferable starting-point in truthing so indomitable that it resurfaces whenever needed. It remains to steep our fact-finding legs in a tractless goo. Decades of getting nowhere has facilitated a collective burnout that prevents most from challenging the authenticity of what we are fed. Largely, conspiracies become a fun game, similar to crystal skulls and Sasquatch. Yeah, keep looking. Look forever! We're forever-lookers! Fun! It's as if regular people are imbibing and then embracing the triviality embedded in this dead-end debate. Let's pull out the foil and make the hats. We're enthusiasts!
It is a bold lie, an important exercise for those who do that kinda thing. Like the military, you need regular operations to hone and maintain your force. This was a great one. It worked. It still works. It may work forever. It's the Cadillac example of media- and news-play that is, all jokes aside: inspiring, confounding, exhilarating, and classic. Also, like most operations, it appears multi-faceted, moving many chess pieces forward at once, not just one. I need to [obfuscate the truth]; I need to [keep the audience lost]; I need to [conserve my authority]; I need to [advance the Lie]. I need to evolve my media toolkit to the best possible version of itself, helping skepticism to schism, splitting my patron audience into normies and weirdos, setting up a familiar showdown that seems to fit everything in our lives. Perfection.
Every Big Event is an opportunity to wrangle it, and transform it, into a propagandizing device, by injecting unnecessary falsehoods and dispelling them incompletely, smoking the mirrors of perception and nullifying comprehension. By 1969 Hollywood had well-become the perfect tool for fuckery, and if I didn't know better, I might conject that she had earned her first Oscar, here. Now please bow your heads, and center your thoughts on the astronaut installing the Stars and Stripes. Honestly I don't see patriotism in the media record quite so direct until GWB leads the USA-chant atop the ashes of the twin towers.
Heck, if you have the resources, you would ideally want to package all your correspondence with lies, to keep your enemy [minds] locked into a confused and permissive state. As Commander-in-Deep, I would order up a Moon Landing like a carryout lunch every chance I got. I would put those Paperclip assets and my new Deep Apparatus to work! Something big! Something, Heavenly! Something that confirms the supreme hegemony of Earth's greatest [authority]. The 60s were a big deal, and the producers delivered on a big show.
The Moon Landing has mystified Space, solidifying it as a Frontier for lies and distraction for generations then and yet to come. It isn't a distant place, but they've made it so. Close enough to observe, but too distant to fully grasp. Close enough to send our best scouts, but too far to comprehend their findings. Important enough to be aware of, but too important to be understood by a layman.
It is the gatekeeper conspiracy that comes before all others. If this is the most popular debate, everything else down the line must be just as ridiculous. Stop now. Where's that Lunch?
We already have been to the moon, may times, even if you're only counting news reports. So have the Russians. So have the Germans. So have the Ancients. And lastly, so have the insects that Ebon Must reports to. Moving shit thru air and space is severely old tech. If you're worth even half your weight in historical sacked-shit, you realize just how silly it is to attack the small details of this production, amidst the vast achievements of the Atomic age or those that came after the Lunar Colonoscopy.
And lastly, it's back then. Ah, yes—Back Then—a magical realm just out of the reach of youthful fingertips (hey, like Space!), but close enough for everyone to pay respects. Here, Fantasy and farce may commiserate with the unresolved past and gradually merge; we are not obligated to reconcile it—that was the task of those who came before us. Back Then eventually becomes History—or "Truth". Isn't it lovely how time settles everything?
In the end, no one in town has the slightest clue of what's going on all around us. We have no earthly idea of what technology our masters have in hand. We can't even agree that we made it to the first bus stop in space. All because of that awful video and its legacy. Clutch move indeed.
Of all the conspiracies out there, wouldn't you say this is the rather achievable one? Camera tricks and visual edits. The whole crew work for the same people who are recording and reporting. The message feels like 'Our Way of Life Prevails' complete with unwavering flagdom. What more American conclusion to the First Space War could there be?
Saint Joseph who Abides would smile and say, "C'mon, Jack"
How did the ancients go to the moon exactly?
WEBMASTER says Exactly? I haven't a clue. But if you can build the Moon and set it there, I'm guessing the taxi service is simple business. The idea of the Ancients as having been strictly earth-bound and earth-sourced appears well prescribed. The Pyramids can't be built today. But the International Space Station can. StarWars with its DeathStar and rebel alliance, may be informational pressure-release. Cheers
Built the moon? Where are you getting your information from? Your webmaster ate one of my comments in a previous post for some reason. I hope you are open for an honest convo. I came in this website for the loigc of steel book and I end up finding all of this paranoid stuff. I honestly want to know what you're talking about. Are you saying that space isn't real? That the planets aren't there? The Eddie Bravo stick?
WEBMASTER says I don't think I feel paranoid. But this tin foil hat is making me sweat like a motherfucker.
I'm very proud to say, that this website is a safe place for any and all Authors, on any and all Topics, including Fiction and Conspiracy Theories, now and until its extinction.
If you're feeling uncomfortable or paranoid, please stick with our combat material, available mostly in the 'Modern Combat' category.
jameslafond.com/modern
Did I say space isn't real? No, I said the moon landing was a production.
If you truly want to get your feet wet, do this (and I mean it): Look back into the historical record until you find an event where leaders massacred their peoples, and make sure it's an event that disgusts you, that moves you. Perhaps the Shoa, a lot of people like that one. Then, ask yourself on what date it was thereafter, that such bad guy shit finally ended, because 'we aint like that no more'.
If you or anyone wants to submit their ideas (writing), we will post it in its entirety, so long as it does not promote violence (attacks against people, not boxing matches).
Thank you and good day!
Nobody is feeling uncomfortable here. Let’s take the Shoa then. The bad guys won WW2 and the painter became evil incarnate. All was good after that and we had “peace on earth” even though the guys that won were proven to be actual genocidal maniacs. I don’t get the point though. Are you saying that the landing was staged as to create a narrative that the good West beat the evil East? Yeah, I could see that. But in a different post you were talking about “terrorizing ancient people into their faiths”. Be honest dude. You think that there are time travelers that mess with history and that religion is a byproduct of time travelling Nordics or something. You do understand that this is psychotic right? That even well-read and decent people that were thrown out of universities for their “hot takes” never claimed anything so ludicrous. That’s that Jorjani shit. He is the only one that claimed that. Don’t you people understand that he is just an Alex Jones for people who are on the Right but disillusioned with the co-opted and doomed from the start Alt-Right? That he wants to make us sound out of our minds so no one can take us seriously? Sometimes the simpler answer is the correct one. Not everything is complex. In the martial arts community we are good at putting in check the frauds and the wannabes but I don’t see the same when it comes down to discourse and politics. Just sayin'.