“What about the Christian Conspiracy against Rome? Defamation of any who stood against it has damned many, like Nero, has been accomplished. Who has done more to socially engineer the downfall of tradition, of ethnic states, then Christianity?”

-Nick Mason of Myth of the 20th Century

…

Thanks, Nick! Answering this questions offers no friends and puts some friends on the fence to see if I can make new enemies of them. Let’s address Rome and then Arуan Humanity as separate issues.

I would answer that Rome was the template of the culture-erasing state. It did not merely enslave peoples, but took their best survivors and made them into Romans. The Roman Tacitus, in The Agricola, makes this case.

Rome, the Republic, which conquered almost all of what came to be the empire, fell before Jesus was nailed to the cross. The architect of Christianity was Paul. Paul was a Roman citizen, an imperial apologist, who used the Roman structure to spread his faith. By Paul’s death the empire had failed to win victories and was barely holding on. Only a few warriors like Vespasian, Agricola and Trajan would continue exterminating Arуan cultures. The many emperors that rose and fell saw no net gain after Trajan in about A.D. 114. I see the Roman Empire as deeply, anti-Aryan, to favor the system of rule over all human nature.

Christian interference in Roman life included palace intrigue, in which Christians, sex slaves and eunuchs combined to trouble the imperial structure on odd occasions, such as against Galerius and Diocletion when the whores, homo, trannys and Christians burned the palace and triggered those emperors’ mild oppression of Christian leadership. Even Diocletion permitted Christians to wield power and hold property.

The real decline of Rome was due to international financial interests, who financed, with loans against the state, the replacement of the head of state, by paying off the military. This resulted in slaughter of entire families and crops of government functionaries from the 180s through about 300. This resulted in the underground, parallel government, which had a tax base, welfare and crime & punishment, that was Christianity being courted by Constantine, who was in no way a Christian, until he lay on his death bed. Constantine, who had himself deified as an aspect of Apollo, was a warrior trying to manage collapsing frontiers, who needed a civic infrastructure to replace the erased class of government functionaries that had been done away with by banker purges going back to the death of Augustus in A.D. 18.

I do not number Rome as a good, but indeed, as symptom of Arуan Decline, with 30 Arуan races wiped out and money worship replacing regard for ancestral, cosmic and elemental powers. Rome was the frame, not the engine for this vehicle of cultural erasure. The warriors that fought for Rome from the very advent of Christianity, were not Roman, but barbarian. Historians obscure this.

What I see as the negative effects of Christianity on Humanity are very similar to that of Islam. Both of these faith’s offer a person of any quality or type a moral equality with their fellows.

This makes language, race and honor all silent enemies of these faiths. Religion on this scale, homogenizes society and enables empires and nation states to scale up. The easy entry into such faiths, very much mimic the easy entry into the Roman system. By the time Christianity was emerging as a faith to challenge the validity of all other faiths—something that only Judaism had done before it—anyone could be a Roman, just as any one could be a Christian. All either of these systems entailed of a member was agreement and obedience to the rules. To fight was not a requirement—that was an activity reserved for heathen mercenaries and their small cadre of Imperial officers. These latter did not live according to any Christian doctrine, but rather behaved as cruel despots and sought eternity on their death bed through a confessor, so long, as the confessor’s church gained money, property and power. Thus, by 325 B.C., Christianity, as its structure replaced the civic structure of Rome, animating the imperial finances, itself sold out and turned into something that many other aspects of Christianity revolted against. Donatists, Arrians, Gnostics, Coptics, Abyssinians, Armenians, Marionites, Jacobites, Nestorians, Paulists, Timothists, Bogamils: these sects sprang up before, during and after Rome was Christianized, pre-protestant schisms that either rejected or competed for [mostly competed for] Rome’s sanction.

In a few hundred words this response has been sucked back into imperial politics. This returns us to a faith as a Government in Waiting. Members of a faith dedicated to the Hereafter very often crave religious self-government so that they are free from subjugation by evil, earthly forces. When this does occur, a government, to erase such hopes, must either agree to merge with the faith, or merge with a rival faith and conduct a purge, dozens of which are on record in Christian and Islamic history. Mecca even fell once. The faith is either erased or it merges with the state, or other economic structures capable of negotiating with the state, and becomes once again, drawn down into the temporal muck of applied political ideology and the machinations of money.

I would suggest that the victims of Christianity as a Complex of Competing Structured Religion are the Christians themselves. For the systems of exploitation native to the civilization that Primitive Christians wished, and still seek, to escape, have stood as judge, jury and executioner in schisms between Christians from about A.D. 200 down to this time. During Covid I attended a church that ignored the law barring services. The church survived that, but was then defrauded by its pastor, who legally used the government-imposed church incorporation guidelines. A 35 person Baptist church, not shorn, but skinned, by the shepherd they had hired to interface for them with the government. For a Christian church to not be labeled a cult and placed on a federal watch list, it must incorporate as a sub cult of The State.

Religious faiths must necessarily deal with The State. The modern State is not based on community, race, faith, honor, grace or any other human ideal, but on Force and Fraud. Notions of equality are as fraudulent as the denial that we live as subjects of political force. The State makes the same claims as a religion: “sacred,” “ordained,” laws, encoded in holy texts. Yesterday I viewed the CEO of Murkha Inc, refer to the cabinet chamber multiple times, as “sacred.” Look for the words “truths,” and “ordained” and “self-evident” in the founding documents, the priestly robes of judges, the Roman architecture of ruling precincts, and one will see the Over Faith, the true religion dedicated to Consumption, of which the Christian remains a victim until he is released from the wicked wardens of The Lie by our most common shared experience.

If humanity does go forth in a vehicle of sorts, the state is the frame and the faith is the radio station the driver finds most to his taste. The engine though is a hunger that drives us. In such an analogy, we might ask, as we wonder about the forces that our earthly conduct is subject to:

“I wonder if this thing goes off road?”

“Who owns the gas station?”

“What if we walk?”